|
The specialist
rating agencies in microfinance have frameworks and
tools for financial risk assessment. These have
gradually converged around objective indicators and
agreed ratios – although the style of reporting or
grading may differ. For social rating, the challenge
of assessment is if anything more complex. Because of
this, we were asked to converge from the start: to
agree on the scope and parameters of a social rating,
the key indicators and the assessment approach. And to
link social rating to an agreed framework for social
reporting by MFIs
The framework
presented here is an output of a sub-committee for
Social Rating and Reporting appointed by the Social
Performance (SP) Task Force, with Frances Sinha,
M-CRIL as chair, M-CRIL being the first specialist
microfinance rating agency to develop a tool for
social rating. Others on the sub-committee represent
the other three main specialist rating agencies:
Micol Guarneri of Microfinanza, Emanuelle Javoy
of Planet Rating, Sebastian von Stauffenberg of
MicroRate ; also Rekha Reddy of Accion, Anton
Simanowitz of the Imp-Act Consortium, Cécile
Lapenu of CERISE, Gary Woller of Chemonics,
Allan Bussard of Integra and Marc
Berger of SIDI. All members of the sub-committee have
contributed to the content of this paper. Others too,
especially Geert Jan Schuite of the Global Reporting
Initiative and Koenraad Verhagen of the Argidius
Foundation.
This paper
summarises ‘work in progress’ and represents a
significant attempt to coordinate different
initiatives and perspectives. We believe it provides
a sound basis for developing further the transparent
measurement of social performance in microfinance.
|